Why are ideas competitions so important for the voluntary sector? Take a look at the 47 thought provoking entries to this competition....
At Colander Associates, we run architectural competitions for a wide variety of clients – wealthy organisations in the private sector, slightly less well off public sector clients and, on occasion, clients from the voluntary sector. Those in the voluntary sector often have the projects that deserve the most attention and, if realised, projects that are likely to be a catalyst for the most significant improvements to people’s lives. But, in my experience, these voluntary sector projects are generally woefully poorly funded, however worthy or desperately needed they may be. Which says something about the topsy-turvey world in which we live.
This lack of funds can mean that good design – by which I mean, that thing that encompasses great functionality, exceptional attention to detail and awareness of time and budget but which also delivers a special, unmeasurable quality, bringing joy and delight to those who use the finished project – that version of good design, is often set aside, as people grapple to deliver more prosaic and basic aims. Getting good design up the agenda is tough when, frankly, any solution is better than no solution at all; as a result, it is often ignored.
And yet, an ideas competition – such as this one, recently organised for Hidden Homeless – can be an amazing catalyst, when funds are limited but commitment is high: it raises awareness of aspirations that might otherwise be deemed too bold to be worth voicing; it draws together talented people to consider solutions; and it allows for early engagement with organisations that might otherwise shy away from commitment. Crucially, it also ensures that the magic of ‘good design’ can be brought to bear on the interpretation of germinating aspirations so that, if and when the dreams become a reality, the intangible element of ‘delight’ is embedded, from the very start.
That said, you should be under no illusion: architectural competitions for the voluntary sector require considerable effort and goodwill to even get off the ground. The Hidden Homeless competition for New Horizons was no exception. From Colander's perspective, it would not have happened without the dogged determination of John McAslan and Heather Macey at John McAslan & Partners who instigated the initiative, and have both shown extraordinary tenacity, backed up with some swift lateral thinking to keep the project alive.
However, it is one thing to get a competition launched and into the public domain. It is quite another for it to be as successful as this one has undoubtedly been.
That success is down to the 47 competitors: to their passion and enthusiasm that delivered amazing, thoughtful and provocative ideas for the jury to consider. Of course there was a winner but we would like to take a moment to acknowledge all the competitors. Because of the high standards they set, this competition will attract interest and reverberate way beyond the confines of the competition process. Already it has got people thinking about how this sort of project can be realised and, who knows, it may even become a reality.
So, I have included all 47 entries to this competition in this journal piece. We would like to thank all the competitors: because of them, this project has inched a step closer to becoming a reality – and most importantly, towards a reality that has design excellence at its core.
Competition winners: Morris + Co
Competition winners: Morris + Co
Second place: RCKa
Second place: RCKa
Third place: Catja De Haas with Office Ten, Erika Suzuki, Anders Luhr and Rosie Bichard
Third place: Catja De Haas with Office Ten, Erika Suzuki, Anders Luhr and Rosie Bichard
Special mention: Adam Khan Architects
Special mention: Adam Khan Architects
Shortlisted: Amos Goldreich Architecture
Shortlisted: Amos Goldreich Architecture
Shortlisted: Askew Cavanna
Shortlisted: Askew Cavanna
Shortlisted: Inside Out
Shortlisted: Inside Out
Shortlisted: Jonathan Tuckey Design
Shortlisted: Jonathan Tuckey Design
Shortlisted: Levitt Bernstein
Shortlisted: Levitt Bernstein
Shortlisted: Mitchell Eley Gould
Shortlisted: Mitchell Eley Gould
Shortlisted: Nicholas Hare
Shortlisted: Nicholas Hare
Shortlisted: Patalab Architecture
Shortlisted: Patalab Architecture
Shortlisted: Studio Yu
Shortlisted: Studio Yu
Shortlisted: Weston Williamson Partners
Shortlisted: Weston Williamson Partners
Akira-Yamanaka
Akira-Yamanaka
Andrew-Hollands
Andrew-Hollands
Cameron Webster
Cameron Webster
Carver Haggard
Carver Haggard
CLTH
CLTH
Design Engine Architects
Design Engine Architects
DT Architects
DT Architects
Elkins
Elkins
Emina Camdzic
Emina Camdzic
Gollings Architects
Gollings Architects
Greta Jonsson
Greta Jonsson
Harrison Stringfellow
Harrison Stringfellow
JCPCDR ARCHITECTURE
JCPCDR ARCHITECTURE
JDDK Architects
JDDK Architects
Kamal Khuhawar
Kamal Khuhawar
Kien Pham
Kien Pham
Maich Swift Architects
Maich Swift Architects
Norn Studio
Norn Studio
OV-O
OV-O
Oxford Architects Llp
Oxford Architects Llp
Raha Farazmand
Raha Farazmand
Sandy Lee
Sandy Lee
Sharan Chandola
Sharan Chandola
SM Architects
SM Architects
Sophia Gravina
Sophia Gravina
Stockwool
Stockwool
Studio Bark
Studio Bark
Studio Dub
Studio Dub
Studio M12
The Klassnik Co
The Klassnik Co
University of Liverpool
University of Liverpool
Xuecheng Wang
Xuecheng Wang
YN Studio
YN Studio